Pages

Monday, February 24, 2014

THE LOVE ATTITUDE SCALE


This scale is designed to assess the degree to which you are romantic or realistic in your attitudes toward love.

No matter what anyone says, love cannot be understood.

When selecting a marriage partner, differences in social class and religion are of small importance compared with love.
Love come only once in a life time.

Love is a violent and incontrollable emotion.

When you are in love your judgment is not too clear.

Most divorces probably result from falling out of love rather than falling to adjust.

Regardless of others factors, if you truly love another person, that is a good enough reason to marry that person.

Usually you can really love to be happy with only one or two people in the world.

As long as you really love a person, you will be able to solve the problems you have with the person.

When you are in love, it really does matter what your partner does because you will love him or her anyway.

Love “at first sight” is often the deepest and most enduring type of love.

When you are in love you usually in a daze.

When you fall “head over heal” in love, it is sure to be the real thing.

Common interest are really unimportant; as long as each of you is truly in love, you will adjust.

It doesn’t matter if you have know your partner for only a short time as long as you are in love.

To be in love with someone you would like to marry but can’t is a tragedy.

Love is best described as an exciting rather than a calm thing.

When you are in love, you are motivated by what  you feel rather than by what you think.

Jealousy usually varies directly with love, that is the more you are in love, the greater your tendency to become jealous will be.

In most cases you be will “know it” you will know it when meet the right partner.

Somewhere there is an ideal mate for most people.

Most people truly love only once in their lives.

If you are going to love a person you will “know” after a short time.

As long as two people love each other, the educational differences they have really do not matter.

You can love someone even though you do not like any of that person friends.

people should not get married unless they are in love.

Love is more of a filling than a relationship.

When you are in love, it’s the most glorious two and a half days of your life.

When lovers are agreed, not even their parents can control them.

To fear love is to fear life, and those who fear life is already three parts dead.

Anyone who limits her vision to memories of yesterday is already dead.

We come in different sizes so get over it.
Marriage is like gift in this-that it is a field of battle and not a bed of rose.(Robert Louis Steverson)
I open my heart for a fresh infusion of God's healing love.
The heart symbolizes the center of divine love. Through the love in our hearts we are moved to forgive, to serve others without reservation, to work unselfishly for the good of humankind.

Divine love heals and blesses. In the stillness of prayer, I draw God's healing love into my heart. If I have let hurt or fear build a wall around my heart, I muster the courageous to let divine love fill me and deflect any pain or suffering. Nothing can rob me of the joy of giving and receiving love; nothing can block its flow. A heart full of love knows no fear. I am a magnet for love that draws more of itself to me; I am a mirror that reflects God's love out into the world.

Hay the best medicine for all types of sickness is a mothers kea....mum i love u so much you are 1 in a million the best of your kind...blessed are you among women’s..
tries stirs up strife, but love covers all offenses. --Proverbs 10:12


Learn More: FINANCIAL LITERACY (INVESTMENT)

Learn More: FINANCIAL LITERACY (INVESTMENT): AN APPROACH TO LIVE WEALTHY LIFE        I believe that it is both desirable and possible to begin to make people financially liter...

FINANCIAL LITERACY (INVESTMENT)


AN APPROACH TO LIVE WEALTHY LIFE

       I believe that it is both desirable and possible to begin to make people financially literate at a tender age in order to make it possible for them to begin to secure their own financial future early in life. In Robert  T. Kiyosaki and Sharon L. Lechter’s Rich Dad Poor Dad, published by warner Business books we are told that rich dad started to teach his son and his son’s friend the basic principles of financial literacy when the lads were only years old in a bid to prepare them to become business owners or investors when they grew up. It should interest you to know that one of the things he thought them was how to prepare and read simple financial statements, including cash flow. His son learn the lesson well and soon began to apply them under his guidance. Little wonder that by the time he was 25 years of age he had build up for himself a substantial investment portfolio.
        Whatever career a child chooses, Nothing is more important to his financial future than that she should have learnt the basic of how to be an investor ( in shares, real estate, and in business generally) by the time he/she is leaving the secondary school, such knowledge will guide him/her for the rest of their life.
        In the contest of this write up the greatest legacy that investor in shares can leave for his children is to teach them the basic principle of investing in share and any business, when they are still young. There are different way in which you can teach your children on how to invest.   
·        Introducing them to investing in share for instance Smart Money, All things Digital, Market Watch United Breweries, Gainer and Fallers, Goldmar Sachs(Gs) Morning Star European Economic Area, Money control, time Warner (TWX), FTSE AIM All shares, Godrey Consumer production, Giuj Mineral Development, and other shares companies right from childhood. Robert schuller said that “You can count the number of seed in an apple, but you can not count the number of apple in a seed.” The potential from investing is endless. However the challenge is not but stock for buying sake but to be an informed investor.
·        Another way is, may be an investor owns share in a company producing soap or detergent (e.g. China OEM detergent companies, Aqua product detergent company, National detergent company (SAOG). The next time she buy detergent or soap from a particular company, she should tell her child that she owns a small part of the company that make it. She could then teach about saving, investing, shares, bonus shares e.t.c.
Or you might even take your child along while going to withdraw some money from the bank were the investor owns some shares. Back at home you could teach the child what a bank is and while people keep their money there. Them she could tell her one reason while she keep her money in that particular bank is she own a small part of it. She could then show her share certificate as her proof of ownership. She could tell her that she had to save part of her income and not spend all of it in order to be able to invest in shares of the bank. This would naturally lead to having to explain why the habits of saving and investing are necessary.

·        Finally, in addition to teaching them about shares I think parents should strive to build up for their children a substantial investment portfolio ever before they complete their secondary school course. These will help in no small way to make them less financial dependent in later life.

According to Albert Einstein, the greatest mathematical physicist said, “The greatest mathematical discovery of all time is compound interest”.  When some one ask Baron de Rothschild, a member of the famous Jewish family of bankers, to name the seven wonders off the world, he said, “I cannot but I know that the eighth wonder of the world is compound interest.” Both of them were right. ‘The eighth wonder of the world is compound interest.” It can work wonder for a small investor who is prepare to wait and see her money grow. As the Japanese proverb says, money grows on the tree of patience.”

    My final word is based on a statement that I wish to borrow from Chris Ferrell’s Right on money: taking control of your finances, published by villard Books. Lets be clear in today world; the biggest mistake is not invest. The financial penalty for not participating in long terms savings plan is far bigger than the risk of picking a poorly performing stock or a bad managed mutual fund. The financial price for procrastinating is more than dollars, dividends and interest payments. You don’t get valuable real-world lesson about money management by delaying. “You have to know a little bit. And then you take the plunge. And then you learn as you go. “Says Paula Kennedy, a Leading financial planner… “If we know about everything there was to know about everything we were attempting to do, we would never do anything. So you have to take the plunge”.
    Certainly you don’t have to be rich to invest either in share or other business and make money. But you do need. To envision a secure financial future, draw up a saving and shares investment this plan on the basic of current information you have.
    According to a Chinese proverb, “The journey of thousand miles starts with the first step.” Friend, if you want to invest in share and make money, I want you to know that you have a one-thousand mile journey ahead of you. The earlier you start this journey the better you can go. The sense of urgency is well captured by the title of Wole Soyinka’s latest literature work, you must set forth at dawn. Why not take your first step today? Do not worry about having to start small; just start anyway and as keep going. Remember what Robert Schuller said about the apple and apple seeds. Starts sowing your seed.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

HOW TO BUILD EFFECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS THAT WORK


Relationships can often seem like fragile things – especially in the workplace where they are often built and destroyed by the actions we take. However, by underpinning those relationships with a few simple principles, they can grown into something secure and lasting.

I have been interested in how people build relationships since 1969. I went on a week’s training event where a group of us were encouraged to look at our behavior as it happened. My most important insight from this experience was that we have the technical resources and material to solve all the problems we have. What is missing is the willingness and the skills to work together. This requires us to listen to each other; indeed, listening is the underlying skill required in all good relationships.

WHY BUILD EFFECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS?

In society we need to build effective relationships for a number of reasons. For instance, the health of people depends on what happens in organizations and what they do.

Alongside that, organizations only function with the co-operation of their members. We all know that ineffective organizations can be very frustrating. We also know that effective organizations can demand so much from their employees that those people have nothing of themselves left for life beyond their working environment. Either of these scenarios can result in personal and relationship stress or breakdown.

Additionally, organizations can have a profound effect on people that do not work for them but who depend on them for the necessities of  life – for example, food, cloth, housing and clean water.

Society is a web of relationships, requiring all parties to work together in order to create something that is good. But what makes society work even better are relationships that are positive, co-operative and respectful. In this way everyone works for the good of the whole and towards a common purpose. This demands effective relationships based on mutual understanding.

 If you understand what people want and why they want it, you can usually find a way to make progress together. The best way to understand is to listen and observe without making premature judgments. In my experience, active listening can help you discover, remarkably, that we want the same things.

High-quality relationships make you happy. It’s often the case that some of the happiest people in the world live in the poorest communities. I have met people in Nepal who had almost nothing material but who radiated contentment because they shared a life together. If your key relationships are working, happiness is possible in most circumstances.

WHAT IS AN EFFECTIVE RELATIONSHIP?

In an effective relationship parties listen to understand others’ positions and feelings. The simplest way to understand what is important to another person or to a group is to ask, then listen to the answer. We all know when someone else is really interested in us. The other person is attentive, does not interrupt, does not fidget and does not speak about him or herself. This gives us time to think and feel accepted, rather than be judged. Listening leads to understanding; if you understand someone else fully, then you know what to do to get closer and work better together.

In effective relationships, parties openly express their positions and feelings. Sometimes we expect people – particularly those close to us at home or work – to understand what we want and to give us what we need intuitively. This is not a realistic aspiration. People are so complicated and react to events in such different ways that even when they have lived together for 60 years they can still surprise each other. We need to say what we need and to express how we feel. By doing this we are more likely to get what we want, rather than expecting someone to notice what we want, then waiting for that person to give it to us.

In order to make our relationships more effective, we should treat ourselves and each other with respect. Respect is the core of any good relationship. We show respect by listening to the other person and by trying to understand how they view things. Quickly forming judgements based on prejudice is the complete opposite of respect. You can respect people (even if you find their behavior difficult to understand) by acknowledging that they are doing the best they can when their circumstances and history are taken into account.

Respect is the foundation for a strong relationship – and this means respecting yourself as well as others. If you feel good about yourself, it is much easier to see the good in people and treat them with respect.

Another key to forming effective relationships is to face differences directly. Differences between people are interesting. In a conversation where each person listens to the others, you may each discover a new truth that integrates (say) two opposing perspectives. This is more rewarding than the alternatives – for example, withdrawing, fighting, grumbling to someone else or plotting. Learning to face differences takes time and can be uncomfortable, but confronting and attempting to understand them is a good, stretching discomfort.

Work towards solutions where both parties win. I believe profoundly that win–win solutions are possible and they should always be our goal. If we both feel we have gained from resolving a difference, then we will be more willing to co-operate again in future. This builds exciting and satisfying relationships.

WHAT CAN HELP?

In exploring what helps us to build effective relationships, perhaps I can pass on some advice that has been drawn from personal experience and from some of the training workshops in which I have been involved.

1. At least one party should decide the relationship is important.

If I decide my relationship with someone is important, then I will invest time and energy to understand that person’s needs and to deal with anything that gets in the way. (It’s easier if the other person thinks it’s important too, but not essential.) Even if I try and fail, I will know that I gave it my best shot and can gain comfort from that.

2. Learn to listen effectively, and without judging.

Effective and non-judgmental listening will help you to understand the other person or people. When someone listens to you, both your own sense of worth and the worth of the listener increases. Judging another person almost always creates distance and defensiveness.

3. Meet people informally, so they feel comfortable raising issues that are important to them.

Most people feel more relaxed in informal settings. If you are intending to meet with someone with the specific purpose of developing your relationship with that person, think about holding the meeting in a setting in which he or she will feel comfortable. When people are relaxed they are more able to speak about what is important to them.

4. Develop a culture whereby people can express their feelings.

We create relationships by sharing thoughts and feelings. When we express happiness, joy, contentment, anger, irritation, sadness or fear we feel more vulnerable, but we can also feel more connected. Unexpressed feelings can get in the way of building closeness. It is difficult for two people to have a useful conversation if one of them is unaware that the other is angry about something the he or she said or did. There is a good chance that this will result in a cold or aggressive atmosphere when these two people meet, and this will get in the way. Organization cultures that encourage people to connect can generate a passionate commitment to achieve wonderful things together.

WHAT GETS IN THE WAY

A number of things can get in the way of forming an effective relationship, including:

* a history of mistrust or stereotyping

* blaming the other party for a difficult relationship

* focusing on the task and excluding the feelings and needs of others

* unclear objectives, roles and expectations of each other.

Let’s take a look at each of these in turn.

* By stereotyping we mean having a fixed idea about what a particular type of person is like, especially an idea that is wrong. A history of mistrust or stereotyping: we get a great deal of misinformation about people who are in different groups to ourselves. There is often more difference between the members of a group than between groups. If ever we think ‘All are like that’, then we are stereotyping. This causes destruction in relationships; everyone is unique and wants to feel uniquely valuable. When stereotyping is endemic, consistent mistreatment or oppression of one group by another is common, which, in turn, reinforces people’s negative feelings that can, understandably, color their attitudes.

* Blaming the other party for a difficult relationship: blaming another person or group is usually futile. It creates distance and defensiveness, and does not help the relationship develop. If I am not happy about a relationship, it is more useful for me to think about what I need to do, or not to do, to make it better. I can change my behavior much more easily than I can persuade you to change yours.

* Focusing on the task and excluding the feelings and needs of others: people have feelings and they bring those feelings to work. Some organizations harness the feelings and help people use their energy, joy and laughter to good effect. If you ignore people’s feelings and drive through the task regardless, then your best people will leave, you will alienate your customers and you will not get the contribution you could get. People are not machines; if you treat them with respect and understanding, and listen to their feelings, they will want to give more and work better together.

* Unclear objectives, roles and expectations of each other: if we don’t know what we want from each other, misunderstandings are inevitable and the relationship will suffer.

EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUES

The remainder of this article gives a variety of methods and examples for building effective relationships in organizations that avoid any of the pitfalls that can occur when people don’t know what they want from each other. 
      Here is some example:


EXAMPLE

A company used variable and potentially hazardous material to make medical products. It was a legal requirement that tests were undertaken; testing was also vital for the integrity of the business. The tests took a long time to process and there were several errors. I interviewed people from the quality control and production departments who were involved in the testing to discover what was happening. We then ran a joint workshop in which they looked at what they were doing critically and suggested improvements. The spirit was about making things better rather than apportioning blame. The company radically simplified its systems, eliminated much of the work, and designed and ran a much smarter system. One side effect was greater understanding of the contribution each made to the whole.

Method 1: Joint activities. Creating something together can be an excellent way of building relationships between groups. This is especially true when the activity requires talents, organization ability, social skills and contacts, which you cannot predict from group membership.

Method 2: Team building. The effectiveness of an organization depends on people working well in teams. Team building helps a team to create a clear and shared vision of what its members are trying to achieve. Team members also identify the practical issues they face, start to tackle them together and learn how to work together.

EXAMPLE

A team had a history of uncomfortable personal relationships. Team members did not deal with these problems directly; instead, they would grumble to others. Workloads were increasing, too. Most people felt very frustrated. I encouraged everyone in the team to say to each of the other members what it was they required from that member. This proved to be a positive and helpful experience to all. The team also worked, in sub-teams, on practical issues such as the allocation of work and priority setting. Team members decided to set up working groups to meet later and follow-up on the discussion. Their weekly meeting is now much more democratic and less of a top-down briefing. They have even moved on to tackle their relationships with other teams. The participants are now feeling far more positive, enthusiastic and committed. They have learned the value of listening and talking to each other directly. There is less grumbling, too.

Method 1: Survey work. An objective person who is usually external to the organization interviews people from across and down the organization, and collects a valid picture by asking: ‘What is working well?’, ‘Where are things hurting?’, ‘What do you or your colleagues need to improve?’ and ‘How are you managing these things now?’ The outsider feeds this information back to the organization and helps those involved plan improvements. The process brings things into the open and makes them easier to talk about.

EXAMPLE

A manager noted that customer service on a complex product was consistently poor and needed improving. I interviewed (in confidence) key managers in the nine departments involved. The managers then met to listen to each other, look at the whole picture and work out what it meant. Group members decided to stop blaming each other for poor customer service and to work together to improve it. They set up monitoring procedures and involved their staff in creating improvements. All now took responsibility. One year after they start of the work, customer service had radically improved. Also, relationships between the departments had improved permanently.

In conclusion,

The principles of building an effective relationship are universal; they apply in both private and work relationships, and they are not dependent on age and class. The methods that we have covered in this article work best when we understand three simple things. First, however it may appear, we are all doing the best we can, given our situation and history. Second, win–win solutions are always possible. Finally, every person and every group has something valuable to contribute.

A GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS

* Listen to understand others’ positions and feelings.

* Allow each party to express positions and feelings openly.

* Treat yourself and others with respect.

* Face differences with others directly.

* Work towards solutions where both parties win.

Society is a web of relationships, requiring all parties to work together in order to create something that is good.

If you understand what people want and why they want it, you can usually find a way to make progress together.

Respect is the foundation for a strong relationship – and this means respecting yourself as well as others.

When someone listens to you, both your own sense of worth and the worth of the listener increase.

Using these materials
I am entirely happy for you to use or draw on any of these materials in any way you think will be helpful. I am keen to have my work, and the work of the people I have learned from, used. 

PARENTING


Embedded image permalinkWhat the vast majority of nowadays children need is to stop being pampered, stop being indulged, stop being chauffeured, stop being catered to. In the final analysis it is not what you do for your children but what you have taught them to do for themselves that will make them successful human beings. – Ann Landers Columnist.
          There is a story of Picasso’s mother who was most ambitious for him. She told him if he were to become a soldier that he would be a general and if he were to become a monk he would end up as a pope. But alas, he become a painter and end up Picasso. 

Such is an enormous influence of parents. “What the world needs is not romantics lovers but husbands and wives who willingly give their time and attention to their children. – Margaret Mead. 

Although their guidelines for effective parenting as reveal in this write-up, a number of influential factors are beyond control (for example societal influence, peers, genetics, economics, health etc).

          ROLES INVOLVED IN PARENTING
Although one definition of parenting is difficult, there is general agreement about the roles parent play in the lives of their children. New parents assume at least seven roles which I analyzed here.

1.     Caregiver: A major role of parent is the physical care of their children. From moment of birth, when infants draw their first breath, parent stand ready to provide nourishment (milk), cleanliness (diapers), and temperature control (warm blanket). 

The need for such sustained care continues and becomes an accepted and anticipated role of parents. Who accuse themselves early from a party because they “need to check on the baby” they are alerting the hostess of commitment to the role of caregiver.
 
2.     Teacher: All parents think they have the philosophy of life of set principles their children will benefit from. Parents parent later discover that their children may not be interested in their religion or philosophy – indeed, they may rebel against it. 

This possibility does not deter them from their role as a teacher. Children are forever learning from their parents, more often by  observing their behavior; parents also feel that their role is made more difficult by an increasingly liberal society.

 One of the biggest problem confronting parents today is the social influence on their children. These include drugs and alcohol; peer pressure, TV, internet, and movies; crime and gangs.
3.     Emotional resource: Beyond providing physical care, parent are sensitive to the emotional needs of children in terms of their need to belong, to be loved, and to develop positive self-concepts. In hugging, holding and kissing  an infants, parents not only express their love for the infants but also reflect an awareness that such display of emotion is good for the child’s sense of self-worth. Kouros et al(2008) found that children exhibit increased emotional insecurity when their parents are in conflict or depression. The family context is the emotion context for children. Strife or depression does not occur without a negative effect on the children.  
4.     Ritual bearer: To build a sense of family cohesiveness, parents often foster ritual to binds members together in emotion and in memory. Prayer at meal and before bed time, birthday celebrations, and vacationing at the same place (beach, mountains, and so on) provide predictable times of togetherness and sharing.  

5.     Economic resource: new parents are also actually aware of the costs for medical care, food, and clothes for infants and seek ways to ensure that  such resources are available to their children. 

Working longer hours, taking second jobs and cutting back on leisure expenditures are attempt to ensure that money is available to meet the need of the child. Sometimes to ensure that money for the family has negative consequence for the children. 

Rapoport and Le Bourdais (2008) investigated the effects of parents working schedules on the time they devote to their children and confirmed that the more parents worked, the less time they spent with their children. In view of extensive work schedules,  parents are under pressure to spend “quality” time with their children , and it is implied that putting children in day care robs children off this time. 

Although the mothers of children in day care spent less time with their children than the mothers who care for their children at home. Parents provide an economic resource for their children by providing free room and board for them. Some young adults continue to live with their parents well into adulthood and times such as following a divorce, job loss and so on.
6.     Health pro motion: the family is a major agent for health promotion. Children learning from the family context about healthy food. Indeed, one­-third of children of now a days are overweight. A major causes of  overweight children is parents who do not teach healthy food choices, let their children watch TV all day, and are bad models ( eat junk food and don’t exercise). Health promotion also involves sunburn protection, responsible use of alcohol, and safe driving skills.
7.     Protector: parents also feel the need to protect their children from harm. This role may begin in pregnancy. Vast majority of  the woman reduce the smoking behavior during pregnancy while some even stop smoking behavior during pregnancy. 

Other expression  of the protection role include insisting that  children wear seat belts, protecting them from violence or nudity in the media, and protecting them from strangers.     

Saturday, February 22, 2014

THE CONTROL OF THOUGHT OUR INABILITY TO THINK CAREFULLY

THE CONTROL OF THOUGHT; OUR INABILITY TO THINK CAREFULLY
 


Thinking is not simple. It is something that people must learn. If one is free, there is needs to be a critical, logical, analytical, open examination of what others teach us and what we come to believe. This is extremely important. 

Without this one is likely to accept and simply memorize ideas. One is likely to be lazy in his/her pursuit of truth. One does not have tool with which he/she can evaluate the truth or falsehood of any idea one might encounter.
          Social psychologists study the many way people are influenced to accept ideas that they hear or read or even work out their own thinking. It is important to question what we are taught and what we come to believe.

 It is important to what constitute good audience and to recognize the way people are influencing us not by evidence, but by tricks, by false logic, by making themselves attractive. It is important to understand our emotional commitments, our value, our biases, our culture, our position in structure in other to evaluate how we have arrives at views.

 In some way learning is buying something from someone who is selling; freedom of though must include a knowledgeable thinking process. One must habitually think about the knowledge and thinking he or she uses.
          This is one of the most skills that formal education should emphasize. Understanding philosophy, natural and social science, humanities, history, literature, language, learning to write, and many other arts classes should all b aimed, in part, to learning how to think. Actually, the term “liberal arts” suggests “liberation”.

 Liberal arts is not a mass of knowledge we need to learn and memorize. Instead, for many teachers good thinking is the real essence of liberation.
          Thinking is an important aspect of human behavior. If the human being is in control of what he or she does, then his or her thinking is central to that control. We think through the culture, language knowledge and understandings that learn. 

We think according to the positions we fill in the social structure according to what we learn from those in powerful position in the structure. Our thinking is controlled by aside social factors, and because of that control it is difficult to argue for the existence of free thinking.   

Freedom is more than free thinking. Even if our thought might have a degree of freedom, then we must go further and ask what, if anything, limits our action?

LIMITED UNDERSTANDING
What we know makes a difference to our ability to think freely. We account knowledge through a mixture of experiences, formal learning, informal learning, reading, discussion, initiation, and trials and error. 

No one understand everything, and no one can understand everything in a given situation. No one has every perspective that can be used in a situation; no one is able to understand all possible choices in the situation. 

What we learn is little and it is a very limited sample of knowledge. We sometimes think we understand when we do not; usually our cultural bias stands in the way of understanding. Sometimes what we learn from others is not accurate; sometimes there is no opportunity in our community to understand our own but we expect to simply accept what others tell us.

 Sometimes our understanding is so firm and unchangeable that we are not willing to change it when new evidence is put forward.
          Knowledge about the universe as well as an understanding of that knowledge is important for freedom. It’s necessary for choice, working out situation we encounter, and rationally controlling our actions, appropriately.

 That is why a free society that encourages debate, criticism, exploration of truth, and a plurality of perceptive is so critical for individual freedom. As all of us are limited in our knowledge and understand, it is important to recognize that as knowledge and understanding increase, more freedom has a better chance.

 Those who lack knowledge and understanding of the situation in which they act are especially limited in their freedom of thought, and this will have implications for the choices they make for their action.